Sutton Council have had their active travel funding cut after they "prematurely" removed their cycling schemes.

The Department for Transport announced that local authorities in Brighton, Leicestershire, Liverpool and Portsmouth are among those whose active travel funding has been halted.

Seven London boroughs are also affected, such as the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, Wandsworth and Ealing.

Pop-up cycle lanes and low traffic neighbourhoods – often involving closing roads to motor vehicles – were installed across England following the coronavirus outbreak last year.

But a number of councils reversed the schemes following vocal opposition by motorists.

In Sutton, the schemes caused uproar across the borough which led to a number of protests and public demonstrations.

Through daily protests, residents hoped to persuade the council to follow in other's footsteps as congestion, pollution and anger continued to build surrounding the schemes.

MORE: Residents call for 'obstacle course' wands to be removed

Your Local Guardian: Cycling lane in Sutton Cycling lane in Sutton

Worcester Park residents called the council to remove wands which made up a cycling lane by Worcester Park Railway Bridge as they would 'routinely fall'.

Residents said they were not fit for purpose and compared the cycling lane to a dangerous 'obstacle' course for cyclists on Central Road.

The scheme, which was introduced in May 2020, was reversed in September 2020.

In a letter to local authority leaders, transport minister Chris Heaton-Harris wrote: “For all the controversy these schemes can sometimes cause, there is strong and growing evidence that they command public support.

“I do know that a few councils have removed, or are proposing to remove, cycle schemes installed under the fund, or to water them down.

“Of course I understand not every scheme is perfect and a minority will not stand the test of time, but if these schemes are not given that time to make a difference, then taxpayers’ monies have been wasted.”

Mr Heaton-Harris stated that schemes need to be “allowed to bed in”, and kept in place long enough “to be properly evaluated”.

He went on: “We have no interest in requiring councils to keep schemes which are proven not to work, but that proof must be presented.

“Schemes must not be removed prematurely, or without proper evidence and too soon to collect proper evidence about their effects.”