lost news RSS Feed


Controversy over council greenfields homes plan

PROPOSALS outside of the town centre include controversial plans to build houses on five greenfield sites.

In Desborough the council wants homes and shops on Desborough Road car park and Kings Centre site, which would be moved.

There should be a new open space off Desborough Park Road or Victoria Street to compliment the opening up of the River Wye through the area.

In Hughenden, the former Compair site will include a park and care home or “residential community” along with homes.

Bucks New University is building flats and Amersham and Wycombe College wants to move to the site.

Yet the adjacent former De La Rue site will see less allocation for business, 30 per cent, because of the downturn. Homes will make up 70 per cent.

Five greenfield sites are likely to be used to meet housing targets by 2026. Liberal Democrats have warned the town was the “dumping ground” for new homes (see link, bottom of story).

Sites are: Abbey Barn, by RAF Daws Hill, Gomm Valley off the A40 in High Wycombe, Slate Meadow in Bourne End and Terriers Farm.

Abbey Barn south, by Daws Hill Lane, would be 450 homes and either offices, a relocated St Bernard’s and St Augustine’s schools or a mix of homes and businesses.

And up 100 homes would be allowed at the bottom of Tylers Green, by Wheeler Avenue.

The homes target would be met in Princes Risborough at Park Mill Farm, north of Longwick Road or rear of Poppy Road, massively expanding the town.

It puts forward four options for the disused Bourne End to High Wycombe railway line. This could see all or none of the line protected.

For more information go to www.wycombe.gov.uk

Comments(8)

yog says...
9:11am Fri 12 Jun 09

Conservatives in the recent election said Gomm Valley would be protected!
Conned by the Tories again, when will voters learn?

yog says...
9:11am Fri 12 Jun 09

Conservatives in the recent election said Gomm Valley would be protected!
Conned by the Tories again, when will voters learn?

wayneo says...
11:34am Fri 12 Jun 09

I can't begin to imagine where all these people are coming from.

THERE IS NOT MORE ROOM AT THE INN.

Agniesca says...
11:42am Fri 12 Jun 09

Can our schools, roads, water &sewage, hospital and electricity cope with an increase of this size? and will the ensuing congestion kill our town centre (who wants to wait for a bus with a new dress over one arm!

OllieNewbury says...
12:13pm Fri 12 Jun 09

I am largely in favour of new housing development on brownfield sites, and greenfield sites if it must come to that, but only if existing amenities are upgraded to cope with the extra people.

The population is increasing, and all areas of the country have to take a share. Most of the fields next to existing main roads aren't that pretty anyway, so I don't see any problem building on them if it means extending the town.

Would people rather have an extension to Wycombe, or a new village built in the middle of the countryside? I think an extended Wycombe would have less impact.

As for the railway, I hope it isn't built on. A small section has been built on, but I hope one day it can be re-instated.

towncryer says...
12:14pm Fri 12 Jun 09

yog wrote:
Conservatives in the recent election said Gomm Valley would be protected! Conned by the Tories again, when will voters learn?
I recall "con man" Shakespeare and his sidekick Cartwright said no building on Gomm -- SEEMS ELECTION PROMISES MEAN NOTHING !!!!!

yog says...
1:06pm Fri 12 Jun 09

towncryer wrote:
yog wrote:
Conservatives in the recent election said Gomm Valley would be protected! Conned by the Tories again, when will voters learn?
I recall "con man" Shakespeare and his sidekick Cartwright said no building on Gomm -- SEEMS ELECTION PROMISES MEAN NOTHING !!!!!
Just like their promise to keep Council Tax down without cutting services. Conservative Lies fool public again.

towncryer says...
3:07pm Fri 12 Jun 09

yog wrote:
towncryer wrote:
yog wrote: Conservatives in the recent election said Gomm Valley would be protected! Conned by the Tories again, when will voters learn?
I recall "con man" Shakespeare and his sidekick Cartwright said no building on Gomm -- SEEMS ELECTION PROMISES MEAN NOTHING !!!!!
Just like their promise to keep Council Tax down without cutting services. Conservative Lies fool public again.
i read linked article and it seems Lib Dem councillors are only ones opposing build -----
"Wycombe District Council member Ray Farmer said: “I am concerned that High Wycombe has become the dumping ground of Bucks for new homes without any real thought to the current homes in progress or land approved for building.

Fellow Ryemead councillor Trevor Snaith said: “Enough’s enough, it’s time to say no to the building of more homes and additional traffic congestion in the town of High Wycombe.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree