Report this comment
  • "akhanw - I consider myself to be a Christian. Along with many parents I have spoken to, I do not want to send my kids to a religious school because I want them to decide for themselves when they have enough information, what religion, if any, they want to follow, and if the religious schools communicate how un-Christian they are, as you and Derek have done on here, that goes ten-fold. I hear enough tales from the bible quoted as absolute fact that have been indoctrinated into my primary school age nieces and nephews at religious schools. Your comment about the Catholic school illuminates just how biased and un-Christian you are. You can't even resist being spiteful about a different brand of your own religion.

    Derek, you are conspicuous in your own absence - I would like to hear your confirmation of the very interesting fact that you send your children to Hampton School. Any comments?

    akhanw , you accuse the Maharishi bid of not focusing on local community - are you serious? They got 900 children registered as first choice - against the CoE bid of how many? Less than 20% of that figure? Derek, a response please? And do not give the usual 'we are a smaller school so got less numbers', we all know that is rubbish because it doesn't matter how many places there are, we as parents will register in the hope that we will get our kids a place. The above figures alone speak for themselves.

    As regards TM followers - I asked about this at the meeting (yes, I went to one as I was keen to hear a balanced view - not biased and ignorant opinion) and asked the question about TM and how many TM people in the Hampton community would be sending their kids. I was told that whilst there are many people who have learnt and do TM in the area, none of the children are appropriate age for the proposed school. So that is 900 kids plus 600-odd parents and none are ‘TM followers’. I asked about their other school in the north and how many pupils at that school were part of the TM community, and was told a tiny minority (I think it was 3 or 4 as most of them are past school age) and how many since it became a free school and was told 1 out of 80+ new children last year. And that they had up to 17 applications for each school place. Interesting. So much for your ‘meeting needs of your TM followers’ comment. Looks to me like the needs of the TM community in the north have been well and truly met already with a successful and popular school and now other people are and want to benefit too.

    If I have learnt one thing from watching this whole free school issue unfold, it is that there is a shocking number of ignorant and lazy people that cannot be bothered to look and find out info for themselves, who would rather just sit at a computer and spout rubbish. Shameful. I do wholeheartedly agree with your subsequent comment that councils should provide good school places - and your question about how many council members send their kids there.

    The fact still remains that there is a significant black hole and shortfall for secondary places in the Hampton area. This issue is NOT going to go away.

    Mr. Scott, I read your post on here with interest and am impressed that a parent and ex-pupil were so confident and happy with their experience of your existing school that they felt willing to contribute to allow other parents and kids the choice of experiencing the same kind of education. I personally do not think that you need apologise for the fact that your bid was unsuccessful this time at all, in fact your conduct and that of the school you represent has been impressive and impeccable in the face of rude, underhand and nasty attempts to undermine your application, much of it backed by people who do not live in the Richmond area, and are part of the political anti - Free School lobby from what I can see of it. If you do decide to apply again I sincerely hope you are successful."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Maharishi Free School loses bid to open in Richmond

A Maharishi school trust has failed in its bid to open a new free school in Hampton.

The Maharishi Free School Richmond team lost out to St Mary’s Church, in Church Street, Hampton, which submitted a competing application to the Department for Education (DfE) for a primary school on the same site, in Oldfield Road. The Thomson House School, which applied to open in Barnes, Mortlake or East Sheen, was also among the 102 new free schools across the country that the DfE approved today.

Its proposal was for a primary school providing places for 336 children.

The Maharishi Free School Richmond team’s failed bid raises questions over Richmond Council’s long-term plan to overcome a lack of secondary school places in the borough.

The school, which would have taught pupils aged four to 18, was due to open in September next year. It proposed teaching children transcendental meditation, a technique based on the teachings of guru Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, as part of its curriculum.

Richard Scott, of the Maharishi Free School Richmond team, said: “On behalf of the Maharishi School team I would like to thank all the parents in Richmond who have been so supportive of our application. In fact I have always felt that these parents have been a critical part of our team.

“Today the DfE has published the list of approved free schools and I am sorry to say that Maharishi School was not on it. They have raised some points that they have asked us to work through with them before re-applying next year.

“This is certainly disappointing after all the hard work, but there is nothing that we cannot address while keeping the special quality of the Maharishi School; it does mean that we will not be in a position to open a Maharishi School in Richmond in 2013.”

Mr Scott said he had no doubt the school’s educational methods worked.

He said parents of children at a Maharishi free school in Lancashire had all said in a survey that they were happy with it. He added: “Our biggest concern is for the parents who will be disappointed by this decision and the children who would have been our pupils. I sincerely hope that they find a school for them that helps them to develop their full potential.”

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree