Richmond RSS Feed


Twickenham's Regal House to be transformed into 111-room hotel


An office block dubbed Twickenham’s “ugliest building” is to be transformed into a 10-storey hotel.

Although the proposal to change Regal House into an 111-room hotel was thrown out by Richmond Council last summer, the decision has been overturned by the Government’s planning inspectorate.

Permission has now been granted for the 1960s office block to be partly demolished and extended to become a hotel.

Twickenham MP Vince Cable is among those to have voiced opposition.

He said: “It is disappointing that the Government planning inspector has chosen to grant planning permission after it was rejected by the council.

“Twickenham town centre is in need of regeneration, but making the town’s ugliest building even uglier is not the answer.”

The development will see the part demolition of the first floor of Regal House and an extension to the northern elevation of the existing building.

The London Road front of the development would remain the same height as the existing building, while the part fronting Mary’s Terrace and extending eastwards would step down in stages from 10 storeys to six and then three.

After extensive campaigning against the proposal, Conservative parliamentary candidate Deborah Thomas said she felt let down by the decision.

She said: “I am absolutely gutted.

“The proposed hotel is a carbuncle on an already ugly building and will cause misery for the hundreds of residents who wrote to me pleading for this not to be built.”

The inspectorate’s decision was revealed on Wednesday following a six-day appeal in January.

Leader of Richmond Conservatives Councillor Nick True hit out at the council, arguing the inspectorate had given the hotel, expected to be turned into a Travelodge, the go-ahead because of a Liberal Democrat policy which encouraged tall buildings in the station area.

The inspector’s report said: “There appears to be considerable local controversy on the appropriateness of tall buildings in Twickenham and their effect on the ambience of the town which goes well beyond the specific concerns raised by the council.

“However, the council’s strategy on the revitalisation of Twickenham town centre encourages tall buildings in the station area, within which the appeal site clearly lies.

“In light of the recently adopted strategy I can see no objection, as a matter of principle, to a tall building on the appeal site.”

Councillor True said: “This horrendous eyesore will be a reminder for generations of this hated Lib Dem council’s total lack of vision for Twickenham.”

But council leader Serge Lourie said: “The planning committee turned this down and were overruled on appeal.

“The local development framework introduced by the Lib Dems is far more against high-rise building than the Conservatives unitary development plan but the inspectorate made a decision which people in Twickenham will regret.”

• What do you think? Let us know by email (gholt@london.newsquest.co.uk), phone the newsdesk on 020 8744 4271 or leave a comment below.

Comments(4)

twoquid says...
8:10am Sat 20 Mar 10

Haven't seen the plans for this, but they took a hideous 1960's tower block at Putney Bridge, partially knocked it down and redeveloped it into rather attractive flats. It went from eyesore to feature. Possibly the same thing here in Twickenham?

ChrisSquire says...
10:52am Sat 20 Mar 10

This headline is misleading: the main office block will remain as is; the hotel will be built on the north side of the plot, replacing only part of the office block.

alex twickenham says...
2:28pm Sat 20 Mar 10

This is most interesting. Regular readers may not know that Mr Squire is a diehard LibDem warrior - after all, he is their webmaster, so undoubtedly responsible for the "Liar liar pants on fire" gaffe. Since this is the case, I wonder why he is trying to clarify a decision of the planning inspector which goes against his own party's supposed opposition to the scheme.
Please re-read Serge Lourie's apologia and Mr Squire's post and decide whether we may have yet another problem with double standards and this dreadful LibDem administration. Nice words in public but what happens behind the scenes?
There's a lot of similarity to the disgraceful smear campaign against Zac Goldsmith about the Royal Park parking charges and the pointless LibDem "fatal" motion in the Lords. A totally cynical political move to try to win votes in a constituency they think they might lose.
If only we had the same strong challenge in Twickenham.
Alex

Phillip Taylor says...
4:29pm Sat 20 Mar 10

Alex is right. It is Complacent Cable and his cronies who have created this unelected, Quangocracy- the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol. Labour (and Vince hasn't left his roots).

New Labour just love to spend our money on these bodies which over-rule local views.

Cllr True is correct to lay the blame at the door of the local Liberals who have given all the wrong signals to unelected planning inspectors who don't live anywhere near the high riseproblems they are happy to create. I think these 'decision makers' should be named and shamed by the RTT. At least we can kick the Liberals out in May!


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses