Contact us: Got a photo? Text SLPICS to 80360, click to upload your story or call
020 8722 6392
9:19am Thursday 18th March 2010 in
Croydon Council spent almost £90,000 on enforcing the smoking ban with not one conviction or official warning notice to show for it.
The figures, which came from a Freedom of Information request, revealed the money was spent on employing two temporary staff members, a smoking co-ordinator who was paid £44,281, and a smoking enforcement officer paid £38,741.
The rest of the funding, which came from the Department of Health, was spent on posters at tram and bus stops and leaflets issued to businesses. This came to an extra £5,978.
The smoking ban was introduced in July 2007 banning smoking in all enclosed public spaces and workplaces. Under the law, employers are required to display no-smoking signs in smoke-free premises and vehicles, take reasonable steps to ensure staff and customers are aware premises and vehicles are legally required to be smoke-free, remove any existing indoor smoking rooms and ensure no one smokes in smoke-free premises or vehicles.
The council said compliance with the smoking ban had been “satisfactory”, with the only informal enforcement action necessary. No notices or prosecutions were required.
The authority said there were no longer any costs involved with enforcing the ban because the responsibilities had been “absorbed by existing safety and licensing staff at no additional cost”.
A council spokesman said: “These were incredibly effective one-year appointments, over which the officers visited hundreds of businesses and did a lot of other work to raise awareness of the coming ban and ensure that people knew their responsibilities. There was an enforcement role after the ban, but the officers followed the council’s standard policy of issuing informal warnings and only falling back on fines and prosecutions as a last resort. The success of this approach is demonstrated by the high level of compliance among Croydon’s businesses and this is now monitored as a routine part of the work of safety and licensing officers.”
Comments(8)
mcblount
says...
1:41pm Fri 19 Mar 10
caring scoffer
says...
8:55am Sat 20 Mar 10
Brian V Sewering
says...
10:25am Sat 20 Mar 10
buck williams
says...
7:11pm Sun 21 Mar 10
mcblount wrote:how can it be money "well spent" if the dept. did not enforce the smoking ban? what a ridiculous thing to say..
And it was very well spent. I am very grateful for it.
GetBritainOut
says...
5:37am Mon 22 Mar 10
mcblount
says...
1:37pm Mon 22 Mar 10
buck williams wrote:You haven't read the story correctly: The council said compliance with the smoking ban had been “satisfactory”, with the only informal enforcement action necessary. No notices or prosecutions were required.
mcblount wrote: And it was very well spent. I am very grateful for it.how can it be money "well spent" if the dept. did not enforce the smoking ban? what a ridiculous thing to say..
mcblount
says...
1:38pm Mon 22 Mar 10
GetBritainOut wrote:Because the rest of us have a right to stay alive.
More money wasted on jobs for the anti-smoking Nazis. Local Authorities, NHS, Police, Fire Brigade, etc, etc, etc, just how much money is used by these anti-smoking fanatics, to bully, threaten, intimidate, brow-beat smokers to give-up? And I'm not even a smoker!
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find Jobs
Search Now »
Find your ideal partner
Search Now »
Find homes
Search Now »
Find cars
Search Now »
caring scoffer says...
3:16pm Thu 18 Mar 10