Report this comment
  • "Cllr Shields seeks to return £7,200 to residents.

    Remind us how much or OUR money you LibDems have squandered on the Life Centre and ruining our High St?

    So LibDems confess to financial incompetence at last! Kick them out!"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Councillors fight over parking zone charges in Sutton South and Belmont

Sutton Councillor Tony Shields proposed 200 free hours of parking be restored Sutton Councillor Tony Shields proposed 200 free hours of parking be restored

A row has broken out between borough councillors over controlled parking zone charges for visitors.

Chairman of the Sutton South, Cheam and Belmont Local Committee and Conservative Councillor, Tony Shields, proposed on July 5 that 200 free hours parking for visitors be restored to both Sutton South and Belmont.

Free visitor vouchers have decreased from 200 hours to 50 hours since 2005.

After consultation with residents and using statistics obtained from the parking department he predicted that £7,200 could be allocated to Sutton South and £500 to Belmont to reinstate 200 hours of visitors’ vouchers.

He said: "After years of reduced parking provision for visitors residents are frankly fed up, many had been told that the 200 hours would be ongoing only to find it not to be the case.

"Localism is all about residents choosing the things that matter in their area, for Sutton South parking zone this issue was the third most item of residents concerns after the high level of Council tax and the huge waste of money on Sutton high street.

"We are talking modest sums for a big difference, people who have the need of carers or perhaps have work being carried out on their properties will find the restoration of the 200 hours most useful.

Related links

Related links

"It is a shame that the two Lib Dem councillors could not bring themselves to support the 200 hours restoration but I suppose it would be hard for them considering the Lib Dem council took away 150 hours in the first place despite Councillor Mary Burstow sending a tweet while the meeting was in progress in favour of my proposal, politics is a funny old business."

He also proposed to reduce administration cost to zero or at least at the same level as currently with 200 hours of vouchers being included in the March 2013 council tax letter.

However, Liberal Democrat Councillors, Mary Burstow, Richard Clifton and Heather Honour felt that no decision could be made without information being provided in writing first.

On her blog, Cheam Councillor Mary Burstow accused Coun Shields and his Conservative colleagues of behaving like "cowboy builders".

She said: "I would never accept a verbal quote from a builder I would always ask for it in writing.

"I treat council tax payers’ money with the same utmost care and respect."

Officers are now undertaking the work to carry out the proposal.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree