News RSS Feed


Transport booze ban to start in June

8:25am Thursday 8th May 2008

comment Comments (226)   Have your say »


Boris Johnson's public transport alcohol ban will take effect from next month.

Yesterday London's new mayor announced booze will not be allowed on the Tube, bus, Docklands Light Railway (DLR) and tram services and stations across the capital.

"I firmly believe that if we drive out so-called minor crime then we will be able to get a firm grip on more serious crime."

Boris Johnson

As of June 1 drinking from and carrying open containers of alcohol will be banned.

The initiative was one of the Conservative mayor's key election pledges. He unveiled posters advising passengers of the plans, which will now be displayed on the Transport for London (TFL) network.

"I'm determined to improve the safety and security of public transport in London and create a better environment for the millions of Londoners who rely on it," said Mr Johnson, who officially become the capital's new mayor on Monday. "I firmly believe that if we drive out so-called minor crime then we will be able to get a firm grip on more serious crime.

"The ban is supported by the Metropolitan Police and British Transport Police, and over the next month Transport for London will make the necessary legal changes and consult with staff."

Don Shenker, Chief Executive of Alcohol Concern, welcomed the ban. "Public drinking and the behaviour sometimes associated with it can , and does, deeply affect people's ability to enjoy public spaces," he said. "Taking a firm approach to public drinking in this way sends a strong message that public drunkenness is socially unacceptable and will support both the public and transport staff. This in the end, is what culture change' is all about."

Print article » Email to a friend »

Your Say YourYour Local Guardian

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

Simon, South Croydon says...
11:17am Thu 8 May 08

Well done Boris!

Shame on the Unions though, upset at not being 'consulted'. Either you want to help and be part of making peoples' journeys better or you are just out for yourselves. I guess they will want extra pay due to the increased responsibility....

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

D, Croydon says...
11:52am Thu 8 May 08

All these consultations just slow things down and stop them happening. What he is doing is a good thing and will be a positive change. I expect the "consultation" would have included a demand for extra pay due to the new responsibility of telling people not to drink, or am I being cynical?

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

Kevin Davis, says...
11:56am Thu 8 May 08

You would have thought the unions would have been pleased that someone was taking steps to protect both travellers and their own workers.

Still the RMT is the last of old-style unions.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

RG, Surrey says...
12:08pm Thu 8 May 08

This is a great initiative, but how about stopping people who are already under the influence gettin on public transport. I had the misfortune to be on a train from Waterloo only last week, at 4.30 in the afternoon where a female who was clearly drunk got on then puked all over the seats. I avoid public transport specifically because of this sort of person. You would not be allowed to board an aeroplane in that sort of state, so why any other form of transport.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

Alright Jack!, Wimbledon says...
2:17pm Thu 8 May 08

I look forward to Bob Crowe calling strike because his men will be put out by this, after all it's getting a bit sunny at the moment and they need their time down the pub.

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

luke, London says...
3:19pm Thu 8 May 08

The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
3:28pm Thu 8 May 08

luke wrote:
The only people that are going to obey the law are the law-obiding passengers who might enjoy a quiet drink on the way home..
Don't be so pessimistic, Luke. I visit Prague regularly and you very rarely see anyone eating or drinking anything on the Metro, let alone alcoholic drink. At least an attempt is being made and in the right order ie fines, etc come later.

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

S, kingston says...
3:31pm Thu 8 May 08

I think this is good idea, it will make peoples journeys alot better, why should we have to sit on a train, bus etc with people that might have had one to many. They did it with smoking so why not with this !!! GO BORIS

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

Pat, Wandsworth says...
3:53pm Thu 8 May 08

RG
There are already existing railway by-laws in place that state intoxicated passengers are not allowed to use the railways, as they are a danger to themselves and others.
Problem is they are not enforced by the ridiculously thinly spread British Transport Police.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

DAN, Roundshaw says...
4:01pm Thu 8 May 08

people will still drink on public transport, you can always put booze into other kinds of bottles and containers you know. It is a shame to admit it, but as a whole society, this country needs security guards on public transport, because too many people think they can do what they like to other people in public.
A shame because those people who behave like that have turned this country into a nanny state where we have to be constantly watched by authorities.

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

OB, London says...
4:42pm Thu 8 May 08

Reading Pats comment on police being spread thin, I agree they cannot patrol the train/buses as it is to control rowdiness and drunkenness so this law will make no difference to anyone

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Arfur Towcrate, Staffycher says...
6:26pm Thu 8 May 08

The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Arfur Towcrate wrote:
The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Arfur Towcrate wrote:
The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Arfur Towcrate wrote:
The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Arfur Towcrate wrote:
The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Arfur Towcrate wrote:
The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Arfur Towcrate wrote:
The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Arfur Towcrate wrote:
The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Arfur Towcrate wrote:
The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:05pm Thu 8 May 08

Arfur Towcrate wrote:
The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:08pm Thu 8 May 08

Kes wrote:
Arfur Towcrate wrote: The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.
"unions" should be replaced by 'one union leader'

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:08pm Thu 8 May 08

Kes wrote:
Arfur Towcrate wrote: The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.
"unions" should be replaced by 'one union leader'

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:08pm Thu 8 May 08

Kes wrote:
Arfur Towcrate wrote: The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.
"unions" should be replaced by 'one union leader'

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:08pm Thu 8 May 08

Kes wrote:
Arfur Towcrate wrote: The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.
"unions" should be replaced by 'one union leader'

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:08pm Thu 8 May 08

Kes wrote:
Arfur Towcrate wrote: The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.
"unions" should be replaced by 'one union leader'

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:08pm Thu 8 May 08

Kes wrote:
Arfur Towcrate wrote: The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.
"unions" should be replaced by 'one union leader'

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:08pm Thu 8 May 08

Kes wrote:
Arfur Towcrate wrote: The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.
"unions" should be replaced by 'one union leader'

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:08pm Thu 8 May 08

Kes wrote:
Arfur Towcrate wrote: The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.
"unions" should be replaced by 'one union leader'

Report this post »

Kes, Upper Norwood says...
10:08pm Thu 8 May 08

Kes wrote:
Arfur Towcrate wrote: The unions are concerned about who is going to enforce this. Given that Croydon police have been unwilling/unable to stop people smoking cannabis on buses in the borough, just who do you expect to enforce this?
I must say that, in recent years, I have never come across any smoking, let alone cannabis, on buses. As for "unions", it is only one and no guesses for which one that is.
"unions" should be replaced by 'one union leader'

Report this post »

Comments are closed on this article.

Looking for answers? Boris Johnson

Banning alcohol on London's transport network was one of Boris Johnson's key election pledges



In this section

Sponsored Links



Local Links


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »