Surbiton residents may have to deal with roaring aircraft flying overhead for the first time if Heathrow expands to a third and fourth runway.

Richmond residents already have to deal with noise from planes but new flight path plans show that for the first time Kingston could be blighted.

New maps released by the 2M Group of councils which includes Kingston, Richmond, Wandsworth and Hounslow show possible routes could also affect Cobham, Esher and Weybridge.

Kingston and Surbiton MP Edward Davey said: “If we have massive expansion at Heathrow many more will be affected.

"Any expansion to Heathrow is going to produce more noise for everyone in south-west London.”

Richmond Park MP Zac Goldsmith said: “Residents currently living under the flight path are only too aware of the implications of an expanded Heathrow.

“But people who moved to Ham and north Kingston with a legitimate expectation that they would not be affected will be shocked by this map.

“I hope Kingston residents will join the campaign against expansion.”

Robin Meltzer, Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate for Richmond Park, said: “I don’t think there is any solution that includes expanding Heathrow airport that could not affect tens or hundreds of thousands of people who are not currently affected – it is a scary thought.

“If any scheme goes forward it would be bad for people in south-west London.”

Leader of Kingston Council Derek Osbourne, said: “It had only affected parts of the borough before. It would be an outrage.

“We have always been bothered by Heathrow expansion and we would be even more affected.”

Surbiton Hill Councillor Malcolm Self said: “I do not think residents will be very chuffed at the idea of a flight path coming over Surbiton. I am certainly not supporting the expansion of Heathrow.”

But James Leach, group marketing director of Air Charter Service in Millbank House, Ewell Road, said: “Expand Heathrow and people will complain about noise.

"Leave and build an airport away from west London and the area will go into decline as the majority of the 114,000 jobs will be moved somewhere else, not to mention the complaints from residents in the area wherever they build the new airport.”

A Heathrow spokesman said: “We are currently examining a number of options, all of which result in significantly less noise for  residents than the 2M Group’s scaremongering.

“We will submit our preferred options to the Airports Commission in the summer.

“We know aircraft noise can disturb people living under the flight path which is why we encourage airlines to fly only their quietest aircraft at Heathrow through higher charges for noisier aircraft.

"We also offer insulation to residents and are currently working with noise campaigners to give residents predictable respite from early morning noise."

What you said about threat:

Liza Beyer, from Surbiton, said: “It would be a disaster, to be honest with you. A flight path directly over here would probably force me to move out. It is greed, it is capitalism.

"I care greatly about the environment and we are already wrecking what we have got.”

Andrew Sullivan, from Norbiton, said: “I work in Surbiton, but I live in Kingston close to a flight path.

"I do not think it will make a lot of difference to noise levels to be honest, provided the altitudes are pretty much as they are over Kingston. I do not think the volume of air traffic will make much difference.”

Maryse Farag, 25, from Twickenham, said: “I feel sorry for the residents of Surbiton if there is going to be a flight path directly over them.

"I can hear planes where I live and am regularly kept awake by them, particularly in the summer months if I have the window open. It puts me off living in the area."