News RSS Feed


International graffiti gang sentenced

7:56pm Friday 11th July 2008

comment Comments (25)   Have your say »

By Dan Menhinnitt »

An international graffiti gang which blighted trams in Croydon with their tags has been sentenced today.

The group, known as the DPM crew, is thought to have cost the rail industry at least £600,000 with their crime spree which ran from 2004 until their arrest in 2006.

Frankly, some of their scrawlings could best be described as school pupils having to re-write lines on a chalk board for detention or other punishment."

Superintendent Michael Field

Eight members of the group pleaded guilty at Southwark Crown Court to conspiracy to commit criminal damage following the British Transport Police's Operation Shuttle.

The gang were handed punishments ranging from suspended jail sentences and community service to two year terms today.

During sentencing Detective Superintendent Michael Field, who led the inquiry, said: "This was a wholesale self-indulgent campaign to damage property on an industrial scale."

He added: "This group targeted the rail network in a guerrilla-type fashion. Often masked and working under the cover of night they would strike at railway depots and sidings across the country to scrawl their crew name.

"As the evidence shows the tags used were pure vandalism. There is nothing artistic in what this group engaged in.

"They sought only to gain some sort of kudos by branding trains, station walls and platforms with the name of their so-called crew. They thought they were untouchable.

"Frankly, some of their scrawlings could best be described as school pupils having to re-write lines on a chalk board for detention or other punishment.

"Now the courts have handed them a different type of sentence and hopefully these vandals and others that seek to gain notoriety through such activity may be forced to rethink their actions."

Among the areas the group targeted were Grove Park, Orpington and Croydon Tramlink depots.

Although most of their crimes were concentrated in south London they also committed offences in Liverpool, Manchester and Sunderland as well as in Amsterdam, the Czech Republic and Paris.

The trial was one of the largest for graffiti conspiracy ever to have been brought to court.

Andrew Gillman, from Battersea, received the longest jail term, two years, for his part in the crimes.

Just before Christmas 2007, while on bail, he had taken on a casual job under a false name with the BBC.

As part of his job with the art department for EastEnders he had helped decorate the soap's outdoor set at Elstree studios with tags - including the initials DPM.

The convictions

  • Jack Binnie, 25, Adelaide Road, Lewisham - received a 12 month suspended sentence and 200 hours unpaid work order
  • Andrew Gillman, 25, St Johns Hill, Battersea - received a two-year jail term
  • Ziggy Grudzinskas, 25, Ulundi Road, Blackheath - received an 18-month jail term
  • Alex McClelland, 24, Croxted Road, West Dulwich - received a nine-month suspended sentence and 150 hours unpaid work order
  • Matthew Pease, 24, Manor Lane, Lewisham - received a 15-month jail term
  • Paul Andrew Stewart, 26, Kellerton Road, Lewisham - received an 18-month jail term
  • Matthew Tanti, 23, Telford Avenue, Streatham - received a 12-month suspended sentence and 200 hours unpaid work order
  • Slav Zinoviev, 25 St Johns Hill, Battersea - received an 18-month jail term

RATE THIS:

  • the percentage to the left is the actual score
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Your Say YourLocal Guardian

Your sayYourLocal Guardian

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Your Local Guardian account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Your Say YourLocal Guardian

rupert, yorkshire says...
10:00am Sat 12 Jul 08

i think its disgusting that these clearly talented young 8 gentleman have been put inside for their work, i understand that they may have caused thousands of pounds worth of damage.. but on the same day Bristol Council has made a pledge to preserve the work of banksy. why preserve ones work and not a nother. is it because banksy comes more on a political view? isn't it all, destroying of public property? why should he get ablie? .

Mack, Channel Islands says...
11:21am Sat 12 Jul 08

Just came across this story and think it totally reflects a failing system. There is constant talk on the already overstreched prision system and we are subject to reports of increasing knife crimes serious assaults, and regular reports of murders. What do we do? We lock up guys for graffiti no one attacked, intimidated or made to feel scared. I the length of time it has taken to get this to court I am sure these guys will all have grown up and getting on with normal life, Surely we should have a criminal justice system that reflect that and has the vision to give a sentence that fits the crime. I would have seen suspended custodial sentences and community service more appropriate for these guys now and keep the beds in the cells for the next guys to be picked up carrying knifes and weapons on the streets. Next time some one gets mugged or child killed. Just think who is filling the beds in prison instead of them, graffiti artists!!

r davies, bromley says...
11:22am Sat 12 Jul 08

looking at the picture above that is pure vandalisum they should have all been jailed if theres any graffitti in my road im on it in a flash with me tin of paint and brush

Mike, Ex Croydon says...
1:26pm Sat 12 Jul 08

Perhaps they should have a few "digits" removed.

alex, london says...
1:36pm Sat 12 Jul 08

i am one of those involved, and we all agreed completely with the statement below, when we questioned the british transport police as to why they were witch hunting us and not going after more populist street artists such as banksy we were met with blank expressions and shrugs, and the pictures you see are cherry picked to show everyone in the worst light, but even the judge recognised the high level of artistic ability involved with the majority of what was being prosecuted. the men who were sent down were accepted by the courts as actually being upstanding members of the community, all involved were extensively involved in work in the community, working with young children helping to reach them through art, yet now they will waste away in prison instead of carrying on with their work!

Brit1, Wales says...
1:51pm Sat 12 Jul 08

As much as I do not agree with vandalism, I certainly do not agree with prison sentences when someone on a BIKE can run you down, kill you and get a FINE!

Justice? It's a joke.

Mr J Jones, Carshalton says...
3:34pm Sat 12 Jul 08

They damaged/vandalised property which did not belong to them. If they're so talented, surely they could do it on the walls within their own homes. Or is that different?
Again, what surprises me about this is the ages. I thought only kiddies did griffiti?

r davies, bromley says...
4:33pm Sat 12 Jul 08

well said r jones i wonder what the reaction would be if there garden walls were smotherd in this offensive rubbish

Jock, London says...
4:38pm Sat 12 Jul 08

rupert wrote:
i think its disgusting that these clearly talented young 8 gentleman have been put inside for their work, i understand that they may have caused thousands of pounds worth of damage.. but on the same day Bristol Council has made a pledge to preserve the work of banksy. why preserve ones work and not a nother. is it because banksy comes more on a political view? isn't it all, destroying of public property? why should he get ablie? .
Rupert, you're an idiot!

There's nothing talented about spraying the letters DPM over a building. And how you can call it "work" is beyond me. It's blatant vandalism, and is quite rightly not tolerated by people who still have some moral fibre in their beings.

Jock, London says...
4:44pm Sat 12 Jul 08

alex wrote:
i am one of those involved, and we all agreed completely with the statement below, when we questioned the british transport police as to why they were witch hunting us and not going after more populist street artists such as banksy we were met with blank expressions and shrugs, and the pictures you see are cherry picked to show everyone in the worst light, but even the judge recognised the high level of artistic ability involved with the majority of what was being prosecuted. the men who were sent down were accepted by the courts as actually being upstanding members of the community, all involved were extensively involved in work in the community, working with young children helping to reach them through art, yet now they will waste away in prison instead of carrying on with their work!
Alex, you're having a laugh, surely?

You and your moronic mates were caught defacing someone else's property. If you had thought about it, why didn't you buy your OWN walls, so you could deface your OWN property??

I have no sympathy for any of you. And believe me, if you'd vandalised any of my property, I'd be taking civil action to recover costs, and I hope rail industry do just that!

jac, 886-189 says...
6:04pm Sat 12 Jul 08

r davies wrote:
looking at the picture above that is pure vandalisum they should have all been jailed if theres any graffitti in my road im on it in a flash with me tin of paint and brush
hum you a right KENT really arnt you..and have no ieda what is goin on out in the real world

DDD, Croydon says...
6:32pm Sat 12 Jul 08

I can't believe anyone can think this is a trivial offence. Kids who see this will try to copy this behavior,endangering their lives by goin onto train tracks, scaling buildings that experienced tradesmen wouldn't even contemplate.If you think thats not the case,lets ask them what age THEY started doing graffiti.
Just because I may find something artistic or enjoyable, it does not give me the right to inflict it on the rest of society.
Maybe a more appropriate solution would have been to make them clean graffiti for the next two years whilst being forced to listen to their least desirable music.

john, says...
6:55pm Sat 12 Jul 08

i was there at the sentencing, and i am no way excusing the crime the guys committed, but everyone involved showed a great deal of regret and remorse for what they have done and accepted full responsibility for their actions, but have actively gone back out in the community and worked with kids to get them to channel themselves artistically in a positive and legal way, as well as numerous other community exercises. what i take issue with is that the courts had an opportunity to utilize these skills for the community for free, rather than some useless gardening program or road-sweeping exercise handed out to guys carrying around knives with the intent of actually harming PEOPLE, all involved were already set up to work in various projects which WOULD have benefitted their local communities, instead they have been sent to prisons already fit to burst and no one benefits, all of the guys involved were considered at no risk of re-offending and were completely non violent characters, yet they were prosecuted more harshly than someone who had for instance seriously wounded another person with a weapon, i find the disparity a complete joke to be honest, especially when bristol council and london boroughs are now actively preserving graffiti work by banksy. surely that means that they are condoning some graffiti art making it 'legal' illegal graffiti, then prosecuting others, surely thats hypocritical selective prosecution??


Craig, says...
2:17am Sun 13 Jul 08

It's public space... so why aren't advertisers getting locked up (I find their 'art' a lot more insulting, degrading and innappropriate than most graffiti). I
Feel like this is just another example of an increasingly fascist state stomping on all forms of dissent.

Dez, London says...
12:22pm Sun 13 Jul 08

Grafitti on others property is Criminal Damage.

If you know anyone who is doing this in your local area take action.

Firstly if you know their identity report them to the Police anonymously, by phone or letter.

Also report any grafitti you see to the local council via their website. All councils have Graffiti clean up squads. All you need to do is fill in an online form where the graffiti is located. It will then be erased. Then if more Graffiti appears again, report it again.

Soon you will see a difference as the people who do the Graffiti, will get fed up seeing their work being removed.

It's simple just report on those who carry out crime in your area,shoplifters offering cheap goods at the door, drug dealers, thieves etc.

The Police do a good job and need your help, so just tell them what you know.

ANNE GILES, SELSDON says...
6:30pm Sun 13 Jul 08

Hear, hear. Graffiti@croydon.gov
.uk is the e-mail address for Croydon's graffiti removal team. Also - e-mail your Safer Neighbourhood Team in case they recognise the tags. It is criminal damage and police are right in arresting these people.

r davies, bromley says...
6:57pm Sun 13 Jul 08

jac wrote:
r davies wrote: looking at the picture above that is pure vandalisum they should have all been jailed if theres any graffitti in my road im on it in a flash with me tin of paint and brush
hum you a right KENT really arnt you..and have no ieda what is goin on out in the real world
bieng self employed and bringing a family up through some very lean times i think i have a grasp of what is going on in the world like i said theres no graffitti in my street in on it within 24 hours

Jock, London says...
9:48pm Sun 13 Jul 08

Craig wrote:
It's public space... so why aren't advertisers getting locked up (I find their 'art' a lot more insulting, degrading and innappropriate than most graffiti). I Feel like this is just another example of an increasingly fascist state stomping on all forms of dissent.
99% of advertisers do it LEGALLY, you muppet!!!

I also suggest you do a little bit more thinking (not too much now, small brains overheat fast) before you start associating fascism with the removal of a public blight. A good starting point would be to look up and understand the meaning of fascism!!!

.., oslo says...
1:19am Mon 14 Jul 08

Jock wrote:
Craig wrote:
It's public space... so why aren't advertisers getting locked up (I find their 'art' a lot more insulting, degrading and innappropriate than most graffiti). I Feel like this is just another example of an increasingly fascist state stomping on all forms of dissent.
99% of advertisers do it LEGALLY, you muppet!!!

I also suggest you do a little bit more thinking (not too much now, small brains overheat fast) before you start associating fascism with the removal of a public blight. A good starting point would be to look up and understand the meaning of fascism!!!
hehe..

legally yes. but why is it legal for advertisers to put up their ****? Just because they pay an amount of money.
And who should decide that every morning when you wait for the bus or enter your work. There are several skyscraper-like bilboards telling you to buy whatever.


Who owns the city? The ppl who lives in it? or the ppl who has it on the paper saying. I own this shitcity?


I dont believe ill visit this site once more just to check replies. So you ignorant muppets can find a nice "wise" answer and lets this internetbeef pass on.

ill just ask some question?
Who has the right to define art? The viewer or the artist?!

banksy is just a hype. **** what the media made him to..

j, DIRTY SOUTH says...
10:41am Mon 14 Jul 08

how can they sentence you if they don't know what you write- like Alexander McClelland?? FREE DPM

Tyto Alba, London says...
12:32pm Mon 14 Jul 08

What a waste of taxpayers money it is locking these young men up. As has been said, they are not remotely violent and live otherwise productive lives. Surely it would have been better to get them to clean up graffiti, and to involve them in the education of others who may be tempted to emulate their antics. It seems to me that they were motivated by their art, however misguided. Custodial sentences for this type of offence are surely excessive and counter productive.

carly, london says...
3:54pm Mon 14 Jul 08

I put a post on the story about Banksy's 'art' in Tooting & putting the same question here.....

How comes Banksy damages property like these people & it is called art but everyone else gets a prison sentence?

Some graffiti looks crap, specially the names tagged up everywhere. And my boyfriend did used to do it aswell & I've told him before he's an idiot cos he would climb onto railway lines to do so. This is the most stupid thing I've heard, it is so bloody dangerous.

But then you get some graffiti that really is artistic & really makes a difference to some places.

I would just like to know how everyone can sit there & say 'oh banksy aint his 'art' great & he can draw on my walls anytime' then see something that looks similar and say 'fu**ing vandals, should be locked up & made to clean their rubbish'
Can someone please justify that?

jim davidson, south england says...
10:17pm Mon 14 Jul 08

fare play to dpm they were talented and yes there stuff was illegal but my friends were caught for graffiti on a large scale and they were'nt sentenced like dpm. they were fined £5000 pounds each and 250 hours of comunity service. since then they are all doing positive things like workshops to teach kids art and painting schools and community centres

kev, says...
5:32am Tue 15 Jul 08

just sad and pathetic people who are lost in the world,i feel sorry for them,poor little children realy dont know any better way to make a impression on the the world other than silly childish scrawlings,,crew haha,thay ought to be crew on my ship thayd be crying for mumy in a day,hang em i say.look at there pathetic faces what a bunch of sados.

Michael, Surrey says...
8:33am Sun 20 Jul 08

Whether it is Street Art or Graffiti, over the past few days, in the same newspapers and whilst seeing five young men from DPM imprisoned, we have read the reported idea that Magistrates do not jail burglars any longer for such a minor crime and the suggestion that it is ok to shoot them if you are threatened by them. Add to this that some dangerous criminals are being released early to make way for the newly sentenced and it is clear there is much work to be done.

The issue here, in the case of the DPM young men is that their offending was non violent and neither threatening, dangerous nor offensive and showed ‘considerable artistic talent’

A sentence of Community Service where Restorative Justice could take place would have been more appropriate for themselves and the community and significantly less expensive. Under this process, reoffending is highly unlikely and would avoid the associated risks and long term effects of a custodial sentence adding yet more costs. We have to make it happen.

Your sayYourLocal Guardian

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Your Local Guardian account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Top row (l to r) Jack Binnie, Andrew Gilliman, Ziggy Grudzinskas, Alexander McClelland. Bottom row (l to r) Matthew Pease, Paul Stewart, Matthew Tanti and Slav Zinoviev. The DPM crew scrawled their tag on station buildings

Top row (l to r) Jack Binnie, Andrew Gilliman, Ziggy Grudzinskas, Alexander McClelland. Bottom row (l to r) Matthew Pease, Paul Stewart, Matthew Tanti and Slav Zinoviev.

The DPM crew scrawled their tag on station buildings




Hot Jobs

Local Links


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »